Fbi Airsoft Guns Included in Mass Shootibg Statistics

Image: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: Official story of Las Vegas shooting unravels; physical impossibility of lone gunman senior citizen makes narrative ludicrous

(Natural News) It's all hogwash. The "official" narrative of how things went down in the Las Vegas massacre is so full of holes that it begs the question of just how deep the truth nigh this assault actually goes.

What nosotros know for certain is that, yep, 59 people were killed (and then far) and hundreds were wounded. This wasn't a "hoax" shooting — people actually were shot, wounded and killed (and our prayers exit to all their families for this horrific tragedy). Yet the official narrative that claims Stephen Paddock — a retired, 64-yr-old accountant with absolutely no firearms preparation, no gun experience and no physical stamina — was somehow able to expertly wield a highly circuitous (and physically demanding) weapon system for 10 sustained minutes is total nonsense.

Clarification added 10/4/2017: My contention in this story is that Stephen Paddock couldn't have pulled this off all by himself. That does non mean he wasn't involved in the shooting. He could take fired weapons himself, alongside others who were as well firing weapons from either his hotel room or from dissimilar locations. This story does not exclude his involvement in the shooting. Some people are misinterpreting this story as claiming that Paddock never fired a shot. That isn't at all what this story states.

Even highly trained Navy Seals would have a difficult time running a full car weapon for 10 minutes straight. Such weapon systems are vicious on the operator. They crave tremendous strength, stamina and expert troubleshooting to keep running. Total-automobile weapons overheat and jam. They demand incredible strength to keep aimed on target. They require skilful reloading and weapons clearing in the instance of jams, and the hotel room would accept been then total of smoke and pulverisation remainder that information technology would exist almost impossible to keep breathing from that enclosed space.

Far from what the firearms-illiterate media claims, these are not systems that any Joe off the street can but option up and utilise to effortlessly mow down 500 people. Running these systems requires all-encompassing training, experience and stamina. It is physically incommunicable for a guy like Stephen Paddock to operate such a system in the sustained, effective way that nosotros witnessed, especially when shooting from an elevated position which throws off all the ranging of the weapon system.

Far from beingness a Navy Seal, Stephen Paddock is a retired accountant senior citizen with a gambling problem and a flabby physique. The only way he could have carried out this shooting is if he were transformed into a man superweapon through a magic wand. I'm calling this "Mission IMPOSSIBLE" because of the physical impossibility of a retired, untrained senior denizen pulling this off.

Here are 10+ reasons why the official narrative is consummate B.S.

#i: Equally many as 10 rifles were found in his hotel room… just only one shooter?

The NY Daily News is now reporting that Stephen Paddock "brought at least 10 weapons into a Las Vegas hotel room."

Why would a unmarried shooter demand 10 rifles? Managing just 1 full auto weapon system is and then difficult that it'due south probably beyond the concrete capabilities of a 64-year-old retired accountant, which is what Paddock was.

The fact that 10 rifles were found in his hotel room says three very of import things:

The rifles were staged for more than one shooter.
The operation was extremely well funded.
The assail took a tremendous amount of time to gear up upward, considering you don't just walk 10 rifles up to your hotel room in a single trip.

#2: As with many orchestrated shootings, the scapegoat was murdered before he could talk

According to numerous media reports, Paddock was found expressionless in his hotel room, shot to expiry. The official narrative claims that he shot himself before the police force breached the room, simply that is an assumption, not an established fact. At that place is no testify any that Paddock shot himself. It is simply assumed that he did so. I would ask to see the ballistics evidence of the shot that killed him.

Isn't it all user-friendly? There's no ane left to question, and they don't even accept to drug the guy into oblivion like they did the Aurora, Colorado shooter named James Holmes. Eliminating the scapegoat is the oldest play a trick on in the book, as we were all reminded with the shooting of JFK.

#iii: Why are there no muzzle flashes visible from the 32nd-floor Mandalay Bay windows in any of the videos that captured the shooting?

If you await at the shooting videos that have been posted online, none of them prove any muzzle flashes from the room on the 32nd floor that we've been told is the source of the shooting. How can that be? The post-obit video captures the audio of the automatic weapons fire — and even appears to capture at least Two weapons firing simultaneously — nonetheless shows no muzzle flashes from the 32nd floor windows of the Mandalay Bay hotel.

In fact, the video below shows what might be muzzle flashes from a completely dissimilar location closer to the 5th floor. This same video besides appears to bear witness someone resembling Stephen Paddock attending an anti-Trump rally, wearing a so-called "pu##y hat" that was very popular among anti-Trumpsters. One working theory is that Paddock is an anti-Trump Leftist who specifically chose a Country Western issue in social club to murder as many conservatives as possible:

#4 Why does the gunfire in multiple online videos conspicuously sound similar automatic weapons fire from MULTIPLE weapons?

I challenge anyone to heed to the gunfire in these online videos and conclude it'due south only from a single weapon. The very idea is totally absurd. You can clearly hear at to the lowest degree 2 automatic weapons systems firing over each other.

Heed to the automatic weapons fire at about the 2:00 mark in the video below. It'southward clearly coming from multiple weapons:

#5: ISIS has openly claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that Paddock "converted to Islam" months earlier

As reported on Shootings.news, ISIS has already claimed responsibility for the Las Vegas shooting:

Islamic Country has claimed responsibleness for a shooting that killed at to the lowest degree 50 people and wounded over 400 in Las Vegas early on on Monday, and said the attacker had converted to Islam a few months ago.

ISIS has a long track tape of only claiming responsibility for events they inspired or planned. It would not be in the interests of ISIS to falsely claim credit for an assail they did not help carry out, as that would discredit their own supporters and funding sources.

#6: Stephen Paddock had no familiarity with automatic weapons and no war machine training; was non a "gun guy"

From Yahoo News:

Saying his family was in daze, Paddock's brother told US media he could non sympathise what motivated his elder brother.

"Where the hell did he get automatic weapons? He has no military background or annihilation similar that," Eric Paddock told CBS News.

"He's a guy who lived in a firm in Mesquite, collection downward and gambled in Las Vegas. He did stuff. Consume burritos."

And from NY Daily News:

Eric said his brother was typically no fan of such weaponry. "Not an gorging gun guy at all," Eric Paddock told CBS News outside his home in Waterford Lakes, Fla.

#7: How does a 64-year-old accountant with no military training possess the strength and stamina to fire a fully automatic weapon for nearly 10 minutes?

People who aren't familiar with firearms have no thought how difficult it is to conduct sustained fire with an automated weapon. It requires tremendous forcefulness, endurance and training — something that Stephen Paddock had none of. Military special forces operatives train for years to exist able to manage such weapons and handle all the bug they pose (barrel overheating, ammo jams, double feeds, recoil management, etc.). The idea that some senior denizen auditor tin simply pick upwardly a motorcar gun and lay downwardly thousands of rounds of effective burn down in a sustained, 10-minute assault even though he had no experience with such weapons is completely ludicrous.

It actually looks like someone else staged all the guns in the room, perhaps with Paddock's willingness, then shot and killed Paddock to make him the scapegoat.

Numerous media reports confirm that Paddock had no familiarity with guns and certainly didn't have any experience with automatic weapons. Via the UK Daily Mail:

Despite existence constitute amid an arsenal of weapons, Eric said that his brother had never been 'an avid gun guy at all', adding that he was at a loss as to where Stephen got his arsenal of automatic weapons from.

#eight: Stephen Paddock was gambling abroad huge amounts of cash… where did he get all that coin?

Co-ordinate to NBC News, Paddock was engaged in high-stakes gambling to the melody of as much equally $thirty,000 per twenty-four hours:

On several occasions, Stephen Paddock gambled more than $ten,000 per solar day — and in some cases more than than $20,000 and $xxx,000 a day — at Las Vegas casinos, according to an NBC News source who read the suspect'due south Multiple Currency Transaction Reports (CTR) and a casino gaming executive.

Was he paid to be office of an operation that would then be blamed on him past making him the scapegoat? Some media reports state that Paddock was a wealthy real estate investor. If that's truthful, why would he accident all that wealth on gambling?

#ix: Stephen Paddock has no criminal history, no record and no credible beef with everyone

Further supporting the notion that Stephen Paddock was a scapegoat for all this,

Via NY Daily News:

…Paddock had no federal, state or local history with law enforcement before his Sun night rampage that left 58 expressionless and more than than 500 injured. "We had no cognition of this individual," said Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo. "We checked all the databases…"

From the Uk Daily Post, we acquire that Paddock had no affiliation with any item activist group, political grouping or religious group as far as anyone knows:

"…He added that his brother had 'no political affiliation, no religious affiliation, every bit far as we know."

#x: The assault required meticulous planning, funding and grooming… it wasn't some lone senior denizen who just "snapped"

What'due south clear from this attack is that it was planned, funded and coordinated. This was not some spontaneous "lone wolf" scenario; it involved multiple weapons being fired simultaneously, long-term planning, staging and financial logistics.

The official narrative that claims this retired auditor merely "snapped" and somehow picked upward an automated burglarize and expertly laid down highly effective fields of automatic weapons fire for 10 minutes without interruption is so insanely stupid as to be laughable.

But a highly-trained weapons skilful with tremendous physical strength, stamina and preparation could accept pulled this off. And that's clearly non Stephen Paddock.

#eleven: How was the FBI able to almost immediately declare Paddock had no ties to ISIS — barely 12 hours after the shooting — when the same bureau has spent over a year investigating President Trump with zero evidence linking him to Russian federation, all while refusing to declare Trump has no ties to Russia?

Finally, don't you discover information technology amazing how the FBI was able to clear any ISIS connectedness in less than 12 hours subsequently the shooting? This is the same FBI, remember, that has spent over a year desperately trying to observe a Russia conspiracy link to President Trump, yet has been unable to do with any legitimate evidence any. However more than than twelvemonth into their investigation, they refuse to articulate President Trump of Russian federation collusion.

Isn't that interesting? Somehow, the FBI is so amazingly constructive and efficient that they can conclude a massive investigation of Stephen Paddock in a mere 12 hours, even so they never quite seem to consummate their investigation of President Trump.

Go along request questions, everyone. And stay informed on all this at Shootings.news.